Download Arguments in Syntax and Semantics by Alexander Williams PDF

By Alexander Williams

Argument constitution - the development of underlying kinfolk among a predicate and its dependents - is on the base of syntactic concept and the idea of the interface with semantics. This finished advisor explores the factors for thematic and event-structural decomposition, and its relation to constitution in syntax. It additionally discusses extensive styles within the linking of syntactic to semantic family, and contains insightful case stories on passive and resultative structures. Semantically specific and syntactically neutral, with a cautious, interrogative procedure, Williams clarifies notions of argument inside either lexicalist and nonlexicalist ways. excellent for college students and researchers in syntactic and semantic idea, this creation contains: • A entire evaluate of arguments in syntax and semantics • dialogue questions and recommendations for extra examining • A thesaurus with necessary definitions of key phrases.

Show description

Read Online or Download Arguments in Syntax and Semantics PDF

Best semantics books

The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition

Utilizing a cognitive linguistics viewpoint, this paintings offers the main accomplished, theoretical research of the semantics of English prepositions on hand. All English prepositions are initially coded as spatial relatives among actual entities. whereas conserving their unique which means, prepositions have additionally constructed a wealthy set of non-spatial meanings.

Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar

Within the Dynamics of that means, Gennaro Chierchia tackles valuable matters in dynamic semantics and extends the overall framework. bankruptcy 1 introduces the suggestion of dynamic semantics and discusses intimately the phenomena which were used to inspire it, equivalent to "donkey" sentences and adverbs of quantification.

Language Use: A Philosophical Investigation into the Basic Notions of Pragmatics

This article deals a philosophical exam of the fundamental conceptual framework of pragmatic concept, and contrasts this framework with precise descriptions of our daily practices of language use. whereas the implications may be hugely suitable to pragmatics, the research isn't a contribution to pragmatic idea.

A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics

A frightening new method of how we comprehend metaphors completely evaluating and contrasting the claims made through relevance theorists and cognitive linguists. The ensuing hybrid concept indicates the complementarity of many positions in addition to the necessity and probability of accomplishing a broader and extra reasonable idea of our realizing.

Extra info for Arguments in Syntax and Semantics

Example text

34) Smove pound , [ cutlets , flat ] = [ [ pound , cutlets ], flat ] I will take for granted that no semantic operation is transformational. All are blind to structure in their operands or in their derivation. This is a widely shared assumption, standard across frameworks, and therefore enormously important. The syntax may or may not be transformational, but the semantics is always nontransformational. This rules out anything like Smove, and implies that meanings will preserve the structure of the derivation.

To explain that, we will need supplementary theories, to do with the function and content of mental states and also acts of language use. I would like to keep both views, objectivist and mentalist, within the scope of our discussion. Accordingly I will try to generalize over both, most often without comment. 3 M E A N I N G S As linguists we are often more interested in expressions themselves than in their uses. Therefore in general we do not consider semantic values directly. Instead we consider just the invariant contribution an expression makes to restricting or determining the values of its token uses.

20 syntax To make a nonlexicalized syntax vivid, it helps to think of Syntax as building, not categorized sound strings, but categorized trees (Joshi 1987). Suppose that the four trees in (20–23), the first of depth-two and the others of depth-zero, are the primitives of our syntax. ’ (20) S NP VP VT NP (21) VT, /keôid/ (22) NP, /It/ (23) NP, /nevIn/ Here nodes are decorated with category labels. The depth-zero trees in (21–23) have, in addition, phonological features, listed after the comma. These are the words carried, it, and Navin.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.54 of 5 – based on 17 votes