Download Computing Meaning: Volume 3 by Harry Bunt, Reinhard Muskens PDF

By Harry Bunt, Reinhard Muskens

This e-book offers an in-depth view of the present matters, difficulties and techniques within the computation of which means as expressed in language. geared toward linguists, machine scientists, and logicians with an curiosity within the computation of which means, this ebook specializes in major issues in fresh examine in computational semantics. the 1st subject is the definition and use of underspecified semantic representations, i.e. formal buildings that signify a part of the that means of a linguistic item whereas leaving different elements unspecified. the second one subject mentioned is semantic annotation. Annotated corpora became an crucial source either for linguists and for builders of language and speech know-how, particularly while utilized in blend with desktop studying tools. The annotation in corpora has basically marginally addressed semantic info, although, on account that semantic annotation methodologies are nonetheless of their infancy. This e-book discusses the advance and alertness of such methodologies.

Show description

Read or Download Computing Meaning: Volume 3 PDF

Similar semantics books

The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition

Utilizing a cognitive linguistics standpoint, this paintings offers the main finished, theoretical research of the semantics of English prepositions on hand. All English prepositions are initially coded as spatial kin among actual entities. whereas conserving their unique that means, prepositions have additionally built a wealthy set of non-spatial meanings.

Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar

Within the Dynamics of which means, Gennaro Chierchia tackles important concerns in dynamic semantics and extends the final framework. bankruptcy 1 introduces the concept of dynamic semantics and discusses intimately the phenomena which have been used to inspire it, corresponding to "donkey" sentences and adverbs of quantification.

Language Use: A Philosophical Investigation into the Basic Notions of Pragmatics

This article deals a philosophical exam of the elemental conceptual framework of pragmatic concept, and contrasts this framework with certain descriptions of our daily practices of language use. whereas the consequences will be hugely appropriate to pragmatics, the research isn't really a contribution to pragmatic concept.

A Hybrid Theory of Metaphor: Relevance Theory and Cognitive Linguistics

A frightening new method of how we comprehend metaphors completely evaluating and contrasting the claims made via relevance theorists and cognitive linguists. The ensuing hybrid thought exhibits the complementarity of many positions in addition to the necessity and probability of accomplishing a broader and extra reasonable thought of our realizing.

Extra info for Computing Meaning: Volume 3

Sample text

D. Thesis, Stanford University, CA. M. Marcus, G. Kim, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, R. MacIntyre, M. Ferguson, K. Katz and B. Schasberger. (1994) The Penn Treebank: Annotating Predicate Argument Structure. In: Proceedings of the ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop. M. McCarthy. (2003) Linguistic Basis for Automatic F-Structure Annotation of the Penn-II Treebank. Sc. dissertation, School of Computer Applications, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland. L. Sadler, J. van Genabith and A. Way. (2000) Automatic F-Structure Annotation from the AP Treebank.

King, The Fifth International Conference on Lexical-Functional Grammar, The University of California at Berkeley, 19 July–20 July 2000, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA. edu/. A. Frank, L. Sadler, J. van Genabith and A. Way. (2003) From Treebank Resources to LFG F-Structures. ) Anne Abeille, Treebanks: Building and Using Syntactically Annotated Corpora, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, in press. M. Johnson. (2002) A simple pattern-matching algorithm for recovering empty nodes and their antecedents.

Computing Meaning, Volume 3, 55–85. c 2007 Springer. 56 BUNT 2. Why underspecified semantic representation The use of underspecified semantic representations is motivated primarily by the massive ambiguity that is found in natural language, in particular as revealed through attempts to build effective language understanding systems.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.38 of 5 – based on 36 votes